"According to the Code (Greuter et al., 1988: Art. 34.1b) names suggested provisionally are invalid and, hence, this epithet must be rejected. By the time A. fony was validly published (Perrier de la Bathie, 1952a), Jumelle & Perrier de la Bathie (1909a) had already published the name A. rubrostipa, giving the latter name nomenclatural priority." (Baum 1995: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2399893).
Baum, David A. A Systematic Revision of Adansonia (Bombacaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82, no. 3 (1995): 440–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/2399893. (Link)
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
