Member profile - Clinton Duffy
My reaction to this question is that platforms such as iNaturalist are extremely useful in terms of encouraging engagement with the natural world, particularly as people become increasingly urbanised. Citizen scientists are often in places that professional biologists find difficult to access, or are able to capture chance observations of rarely seen species or events. The growth in value of citizen science really parallels the growth of platforms such as iNaturalist and the accessibility of high quality digital cameras. Now people are readily able to document in detail their observations and move them from the realm of anecdote to fact. Ultimately the value of iNaturalist depends on the number, spatial coverage and continuity of the contributions made to it. For example, my most recent paper was on courtship behaviour in Mobula japanica. That paper and my record of Mobula tarapacana from Australia (Zootaxa 4126 (1): 141–145) are examples of collaborations with citizen scientists. In each case my co-author is a recreational fisher that happened to be in the right place at the right time with a pole camera.
2. Could you give some advice about photographing sharks? How to act, best places/conditions to position yourself?
The easiest and safest places to photograph sharks of course depend on the species you want to photograph. The vast majority of species are harmless so questions around safety to revolve around the environmental conditions prevailing at the site (e.g. depth - dictates bottom times and decompression, temperature, currents and wave action). The best places to photograph sharks are generally going to be at aggregation sites, or places where you get concentrations of potential prey.
Coral reefs generally provide opportunities to photograph multiple species. Walls, drop-offs and passes are generally inhabited by species such as grey reef, whitetip reef, silvertip and lemon sharks, and occasionally hammerheads and tigers. Lagoons generally contain whitetip and blacktip reef sharks, as well as rays. Shallow seamounts and oceanic islands in the tropics usually provide opportunities to see Galapagos, silky, oceanic whitetip and scalloped hammerheads.
Of course, it’s always best to go with someone with good knowledge of the area you want to dive. It can take time to learn where a particular species likes to hang out in any given place.
Chumming and free swimming with pelagic sharks (e.g. blues, mako, silky) can be done safely but it takes careful thought and planning, a cage or platform that divers can retreat to and exit the water from safely, dedicated safety divers and a watchful, competent skipper.
For any species it is attention to detail that allows a positive identification to be made, or a previously undescribed species to be recognised. The external characters that are important for the identification of sharks and rays are:
(a) body shape
(b) the relative positions and sizes of the fins
(c) colour patterns, including markings on the fins or the margins of the fins
(d) the presence-absence of raised ridges of skin between and in front of some of the fins
(e) presences of nodules and ridges on the head
(f) shape of the nasal flaps
(g) size and shape of the teeth
(h) presence-absence of rows or patches of thorns (rays)
(i) size and shape of the male's claspers (mainly skates)
A good lateral shot of the entire fish (from above for rays) is the starting point.
4. What about behaviours divers should follow when encountering sharks?
I generally find the best way to observe any wildlife is to pretend you're not interested in them. Chasing or swimming directly at a shark usually results in it bolting away. I have been in the water with more than twenty sharks (Galapagos sharks) at a time with few concerns. It is not the number of sharks present but their behaviour that should dictate when you get out. Rapid, agitated swimming, darting about or at divers are all signs that you should get out of the water.
5. I understand you go on research cruises. Can you tell us a little about the work you do at sea, what is life on research ships like and do you find them interesting/enjoyable?
Research cruises are both extremely enjoyable and challenging. Finding funding to secure a place for you and your research agenda on a cruise is usually the first challenge, the second is often the environmental conditions encountered (the sea is seldom as portrayed in the ads for that tropical island vacation). Time is always at a premium so expeditions usually involve long hours of specimen/sample curation and data entry. The physical challenge is something that is often overlooked but hits home fairly quickly for someone like me that flies a desk most of the time but the payoff is the chance to visit parts of the world and see species that few will people will ever get the chance to see first-hand.
6. Your research on great white migrations sounds very interesting. What is the research regarding and what about the work interests you the most?
I am studying part-time at the University of Auckland, doing a PhD on great white shark movements and population monitoring in New Zealand. This research is a collaboration between the university, NIWA and the NZ Department of Conservation. The opportunity to undertake this research came about as a result of the species protection in NZ waters. Most sharks have been tagged at Chatham and Stewart Islands and almost all have migrated to subtropical and tropical habitats during winter (e.g. NSW and Queensland, Norfolk Island, New Caledonia, Fiji and Tonga). I am currently investigating the use of photo-identification to estimate population size and monitor population trends. White sharks are a fantastic animal to photo-ID as every individual is recognisable from its colour pattern and they often return to the same spot year after year.